Home
Search
עברית
Board & Mission Statement
Why IAM?
About Us
Articles by IAM Associates
Ben-Gurion University
Hebrew University
University of Haifa
Tel Aviv University
Other Institutions
Boycott Calls Against Israel
Israelis in Non-Israeli Universities
Anti-Israel Petitions Supported by Israeli Academics
General Articles
Anti-Israel Conferences
Lawfare
Anti-Israel Academic Resolutions
Lectures Interrupted
Activists Profiles
Readers Forum
On the Brighter Side
How can I complain?
Contact Us / Subscribe
Donate
Boycott Calls Against Israel
Academic boycott debate returns to UK, Jerusalem Post


Jonny Paul
May. 10, 2006

  _____ 

The academic and cultural boycott of Israel debate is likely to return this
month as the trade union conference season, that began in April and
culminates with the Trade Union Congress in September, continues.

The Association of University Teachers (AUT), which last year passed a
motion calling for a boycott of the University of Haifa and Bar-Ilan
University before it was eventually overturned, holds its conference this
week.

It is believed the AUT will not have a boycott motion on the agenda, however
a commission, set up by its Special Council after the overruling of the
boycott motion, will propose that a boycott be used as a last resort and
only implemented when requested by a trade union at a university or college
concerned.

At the end of May, the National Association of Teachers in Further and
Higher Education (NATFHE), the largest university and college trade union in
the UK, will discuss two motions at its annual conference.

One of them calls for academic responsibility, noting "the continuing
Israeli apartheid policies, including construction of the exclusion wall,
and discriminatory educational practices."

It calls on union members to "consider their own responsibility for ensuring
equity and non-discrimination in contacts with Israeli educational
institutions or individuals and the appropriateness of a boycott of those
that do not publicly dissociate themselves from such policies."

The other motion acknowledges the victory of Hamas in the Palestinian
Legislative Council elections: "The conference condemns the hysterical
reporting of the result by most of the British news media and the outrageous
bias shown by UK government statements against the outcome of a democratic
process."

It also calls for the protection and support of Palestinian academic
institutions "in the face of continual attacks by Israel's government."

At last year's NATFHE conference, a motion supporting the right of AUT to
boycott Israeli universities was passed virtually unanimously. However parts
of the motion had to be rewritten after legal advice.

This year the motion is in the form of a "silent boycott" to ensure that if
a boycott is passed, individuals will not be identified, the union will not
be seen as a promoter of a boycott and to avoid any legal proceedings or
accusations of misusing union funds.

NATFHE is set to merge with AUT after the conference. Thus it is more likely
that a more substantial boycott motion will return next year.

A boycott of Israel is likely to be discussed at a number of other upcoming
conferences. Some of the unions work closely with Palestinian General
Federation of Trade Unions and also the Palestinian Solidarity Campaign
(PSC), a non-governmental organization accused of an anti-Israel agenda.

A PSC trade union conference, sponsored by 13 unions, was held in March.
Entitled "Palestinian Workers Challenging the Occupation," speakers included
Diana Buttu, legal adviser to the PLO; Keith Sonnet, deputy general
secretary of UNISON; Barry Camfield, assistant to the general secretary of
Transport and General Workers Union; and Shaher Saed, general secretary of
the Palestinian General Federation of Trade Unions.

At the conference, Saed called for an international campaign of solidarity
with the Palestinian people.

The PSC works closely with the trade union movement in Britain to "further
the Palestinian cause and raise awareness of the plight of Palestinian
workers within the labor and trade union movement." It also work closely
with the Palestinian trade union movement, encouraging twinning, delegations
to the territories and building solidarity links.

Roger Lyons, chairman of Trade Union Friends of Israel, said, "We are faced
with a constant challenge in today's trade union movement to ensure that
understandable support for Palestinian self-determination is not translated
into bias and boycotts against Israel. It is important that British trade
unionists demonstrate support for Israeli and Palestinian trade unions and
working people to help strengthen their efforts towards peace and social
justice in the region."

Ronnie Fraser, director of the Academic Friends of Israel, said, "The unions
offer support when there is right-wing anti-Semitism but do not acknowledge
the existence of left wing anti-Semitism. Any protest against it is labelled
as an attempt to silence critics of Israel. When this happens, the unions
should defend its members against discrimination, yet all too often they
compound the situation by failing to recognize and often actively denying
the existence of a problem."

Meanwhile, a number of trade unions, including NATFHE, are supporting a
pro-Palestinian demonstration in Trafalgar Square on May 20. Organized by a
host of groups, including PSC, Palestine Return Center and Friends of
Al-Aksa, flyers call on Israel and the European Union to "stop starving
Palestinians, recognize Palestinian democracy and end the occupation."

Supporting the accusation that Israel has decided to strengthen the economic
blockade of the Palestinians, Dov Weisglass, a senior adviser Prime Minister
Ehud Olmert, is quoted on the flyer, "It is like an appointment with a
dietician, the Palestinians will get a lot thinner but won't die."

The flyers also urge people to write to their MPs and European MPs, stating,
"The Palestinian people need your help" as "Israel's brutal occupation of
the Palestinian people is creating a humanitarian crisis."

They also call on Israel to "dismantle the 'Apartheid Wall,' abide by
international law and recognize the democratically elected Palestinian
government." While they do not call for the Hamas government to recognize
Israel's right to exist, they call for an acknowledgement of "Palestine's
right to exist."
Back to "Boycott Calls Against Israel"Send Response
Top Page
    Developed by Sitebank & Powered by Blueweb Internet Services
    Visitors: 243691265Send to FriendAdd To FavoritesMake It HomepagePrint version
    blueweb