Home
Search
òáøéú
Board & Mission Statement
Why IAM?
About Us
Articles by IAM Associates
On the Brighter Side
Ben-Gurion University
Hebrew University
University of Haifa
Tel Aviv University
Other Institutions
Boycott Calls Against Israel
Israelis in Non-Israeli Universities
Anti-Israel Petitions Supported by Israeli Academics
General Articles
Lawfare
Activists Profiles
Readers Forum
Photographs
Anti-Israel Conferences
How can I complain?
Contact Us / Subscribe
Donate
Number of visitors to IAM
Ben-Gurion University
BGU Neve Gordon: "Israelis should learn from the pro-democracy movements across the Arab world"


Neve Gordon's article follows the IAM editorial piece

IAM Editorial: Neve Gordon Is at It Again


Professor Neve Gordon, a political scientist from Ben Gurion University, made a career out distorting and besmirching the image of Israel.  A pioneer of equating Israel with South Africa’s apartheid regime, he holds that Zionism is a colonial movement that ethnically cleansed the Palestinians and is active in the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement.   According to some students, Professor Gordon has made such views part of his classes.

In the latest episode, Professor Gordon uses the current upheaval in the Middle East to argue that while millions of Arabs are fighting to end tyranny, Israel is regressing by adopting racist laws and keeping the Palestinians under an apartheid and colonial system.  Israel Academia Monitor (IAM) does not take a stand on the laws discussed in his article, but wants to emphasize that Neve Gordon’s analysis is one of exaggeration, misinformation and omission. 


As a political scientist, Professor Gordon should be aware that such upheavals have not always led to democracy in the Middle East.  The Tehran Spring in 1978-9 against the Shah of Iran ushered one of the bloodiest dictatorships in modern history.  For more than thirty years now, the Islamist regime in Iran has jailed, tortured and killed anyone who dares to protest.  The once-banned radical Islamist Ennahda Party in Tunisia has emerged as a powerful force ahead of the July 24 election.  Outside the political arena, Islamist vigilantes have been reported to attack unveiled women, artists and bars that serve alcohol, prompting a mounting concern among secular activists.     Although it is too early to predict the end-game in Egypt, the flagship of the Arab Spring, some early developments are not encouraging.  Muslim Brotherhood and the Salafi groups - the most radical brand of Islamists who want to incorporate Sharia law- are poised to make an impact on the emerging political system.  One immediate result is a dramatic increase of violence against the Copts; since the fall of the Mubarak regimes, scores of Copts have been killed and a number of churches burned.


Professor Gordon’s claim that Israel is responsible for all that has happened in the Palestinian Authority (PA), because it had sovereignty, is most egregious.  When the PA was launched in 1994, there were high hopes that it would become a model of democracy in the Arab world.  To help with economic development, Western donors made the PA the largest per –capita aid receiver in history.  Yet, led by Yasser Arafat, the PA became a highly mismanaged, corrupt and violent entity.  Indeed, the situation became so intolerable that Edward Said felt compelled to chastise Arafat and his Fatah cronies for the misery they had inflicted on the people.  Said and numerous pro-Palestinian advocates called on Arafat to step down.  It is ironic that in 2002, during the Second Intifada, Professor Gordon stayed days and nights in the Mukata, the PA headquarters, to prevent the Israeli army from shelling the compound.  Acting as a human shield, he was willing to sacrifice his life to protect a corrupt dictator! 


The history of the Gaza Strip, now a de facto second Palestinian state, is even more sobering. After winning a parliamentary majority in a democratic election in 2006, Hamas proceeded to force out the Fatah faction in a bloody coup in 2007.  Ever since, the Islamists have utilized their control over the Strip to shell southern Israel and brutalize its own population.   Hamas, a group that has been on the terror list of the United States and European Union, has been cited for human rights violations as well.  In 2009 it kidnapped the Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit; contrary to the Geneva Conventions he has been kept in total isolation and no Red Cross access.  At the same time, Israel which holds hundreds of Hamas prisoners, has allowed Red Cross visitation, in spite of the fact that these combatants are not covered by the Convections.


Finally, it should be pointed out that Professor Gordon, who has constantly denounced Israel for double standards, needs to examine his own writings that limit the critique to Israel alone.  Like many in the radical fraternity, he lives by the motto: “Israel can do no right and the Palestinians can do no wrong.”   

 

 

 

 



http://www.palestinechronicle.com/view_article_details.php?id=16855

Israel's New Laws Promote Repression

By Neve Gordon

'Bad laws,' Edmund Burke once said, 'are the worst sort of tyranny.'

The millions of people who have been protesting - from Tunis, Egypt and Libya, to Bahrain, Yemen and Syria - appear to have recognised this truism and are demanding the end of emergency law and the drafting of new constitutions that will guarantee the separation of powers, free, fair and regular elections, and basic political, social and economic rights for all citizens. 
 
To put it succinctly, they are fighting to end tyranny.
 
Within this dramatic context it is also fruitful to look at Israel, which is considered by many as the only democracy in the Middle East and which has, in many ways, been an outlier in the region. One might ask whether Israel or not stands as a beacon of light for those fighting tyranny.
 
On the one hand, the book of laws under which Israel's citizenry live is - with the exception of a handful of significant laws that privilege Jews over non-Jews - currently very similar to those used in most liberal democracies, where the executive, legislative and judicial powers are separated, there are free, fair and regular elections, and the citizens enjoy basic rights - including freedom of expression and association.
 
Israel's Double Standard

However, on the other hand, the Israeli military law used to manage the Palestinians are similar to those deployed in most Arab countries, where there is no real separation of powers and people are in many respects without rights. Even though there has been a Palestinian Authority since the mid-1990s, there is no doubt that sovereignty still lies in Israeli hands.

One accordingly notices that in this so-called free and democratic country, there are in fact two books of laws, one liberal for its own citizenry and the other for Palestinians under its occupation. Hence, Israel looks an awful lot like apartheid or colonialism.
 
But can Israel's democratic parts serve as a model of emulation for pro-democracy activists in the neighbouring Arab countries? 
 
The answer is mixed - because as Arab citizens across the region struggle against tyranny, in Israel there appears to be an opposite trend, whereby large parts of the citizenry are not only acquiescent but have been supportive of Knesset members who are drafting new legislation to silence public criticism and to delegitimize political rivals, human rights organizations, and the Palestinian minority. The idea is to legally restrict individuals and groups that hold positions at odds with the government's right-wing agenda by presenting them as enemies of the State.
 
The Association for Civil Rights in Israel recently warned that the laws promoted by the Knesset are dangerous and will have severe ramifications for basic human rights and civil liberties. The association, which is known for its evenhanded approach, went on to claim that the new laws "contribute to undemocratic and racist public stands, which have been increasingly salient in Israeli society in the past few years".

New Wave of Repressive Laws
 
Here are just a few examples of approximately twenty bills that have either been approved or are currently under consideration.
 
• The Knesset approved a new law stating that organisations and institutions that commemorate Nakba Day, "deny the Jewish and democratic character of the State", and shall not receive public funds. Thus, even in the Arab schools within Israel, the Nakba must be erased. So much for democratic contestation and multiculturalism.
 
• Another new law states that "acceptance committees" of villages and communities may turn down a candidate if he or she "fails to meet the fundamental views of the community". According to ACRI, this bill intends to deny ethnic minorities' access to Jewish communities set up on predominantly public lands. So unless the new Arab pro-democracy movements want to base their countries on apartheid-like segregation, this is also not a law to emulate.

• The Knesset has approved a bill that pardons most of the protesters who demonstrated against Israel's withdrawal from Gaza. Although legislation easing punitive measures against persons who exercise their right to political protest is, in principle, positive, this particular bill blatantly favours activists with a certain political ideology. This does not bode well for the basic notion of equality before the law.
 
• An amendment to the existing Penalty Code stipulates that people who publish a call that denies the existence of the State of Israel as a Jewish and democratic state shall be imprisoned. This extension of the existing law criminalises political views that the ruling political group does not accept. It is supported by the government and has passed a preliminary reading. Burgeoning democracies should definitely shy away from such legislation.
 
• There is currently a proposed bill to punish persons who initiate, promote, or publish material that might serve as grounds for imposing a boycott. The bill insists that these people are committing an offence and may be ordered to compensate parties economically affected by that boycott, including fixed reparations of 30,000 New Israeli Shekels (US$8,700), without an obligation on the plaintiffs to prove damages. This bill has already passed the first reading.
 
• Finally, a bill presented to the Knesset in October would require members of local and city councils, as well as some other civil servants, to pledge allegiance to Israel as a Jewish and democratic state.
 
Democracy for a Few

There is a clear logic underlying this spate of new laws; namely, the Israeli government's decision to criminalise alternate political ideologies, such as the idea that Israel should be a democracy for all its citizens.
 
Hence, one witnesses an inverse trend - as the Arab citizens in the region struggle for more openness and indeed democracy, toppling dictators and pressuring governments to make significant liberal reforms, the Israeli book of laws is being rewritten so as to undercut democratic values.

Israelis celebrating the state's 63rd birthday should closely examine the pro-democracy movements in Tahrir, Deraa and across the Arab world. They might very well learn a thing or two.

- Neve Gordon is an Israeli activist and the author of Israel's Occupation. He contributed this article to PalestineChronicle.com.




Back to "Ben-Gurion University"Send Response
Top Page
    Developed by Sitebank & Powered by Blueweb Internet Services
    Visitors: 92946487Send to FriendAdd To FavoritesMake It HomepagePrint version
    blueweb