Home
Search
ňářéú
Board & Mission Statement
Why IAM?
About Us
Articles by IAM Associates
On the Brighter Side
Ben-Gurion University
Hebrew University
University of Haifa
Tel Aviv University
Other Institutions
Boycott Calls Against Israel
Israelis in Non-Israeli Universities
Anti-Israel Petitions Supported by Israeli Academics
General Articles
Lawfare
Activists Profiles
Readers Forum
Photographs
Anti-Israel Conferences
Board of Advisers and Associates
How can I complain?
Contact Us / Subscribe
Donate
Number of visitors to IAM
Tel Aviv University
[TAU, Art History] Nomi Heger appeals court decision which prevents Gaza Muslims from worshipping at Jerusalem's holy sites
[TAU, Art History] Nomi Heger appeals court decision which prevents Gaza Muslims from worshipping freely at Jerusalem's holy sites


Gisha Staff - Dr. Nomi Heger - Lawyer
Completed her LL.B. (magna cum laude) at the Academic Center of Law and Business in Ramat Gan, with a focus on human rights. Received her M.A and PhD in Middle Eastern studies from Princeton University, and B.A (summa cum laude) in Arabic language and literature and English linguistics from Bar-Ilan University. Nomi has been lecturing since 1995 in the department of art history at Tel Aviv University, and previously clerked and worked as a lawyer at the office of Laski, Ben-Natan.


NGO Monitor writes of Gisha: Gisha claims that Israel’s Gaza policy “target[s]...civilian goods, not military supplies.” This ignores evidence that restricted goods, such as cement and pipes, have been used for military purposes including rockets. Reports and legal actions filed in Israeli courts promote a selective human rights agenda. Employs “apartheid” rhetoric. CEO Sari Bashi has accused the IDF of enacting policies in order “to empty the West Bank of Palestinians because of Israeli territorial claims there…The motivations of this policy appear to be political rather than security-oriented.”





Gisha Appeals Court Decision That Violates Muslim Freedom of Worship

20.06.11 - 12:41

Gaza - PNN - Gisha, the Legal Center for Freedom of Movement, has today appealed a court judgement which prevents Muslims from Gaza from worshipping freely at Jerusalem's holy sites.

The State of Israel allows Christian worshippers to exit the Gaza Strip in order to visit Jerusalem to worship, but the same privilege is not granted to Muslims from the same area.

The Supreme Court has rejected the petition of seven Muslim women from the Gaza Strip to exercise their right to enter Jerusalem in order to worship at al-Aqsa mosque.

On Monday Gisha issued a press release outlining their appeal to the Supreme Court, saying, "There is no justification for discrimination on the basis of religion: Christians enjoy freedom of movement, Muslims do not."

In the appeal, Gisha draws attention to "the state's obligation to maintain equality and freedom of worship with respect to access to sites that are holy to all religions, under statutory law, case law and international human rights law."

Gisha, founded in 2005, is a legal organization which seeks to protect the freedom of movement of Palestinians, particularly in the Gaza Strip, based on rights guaranteed under international and Israeli law.

Gisha also submitted a petition to the Beer Sheva District Court in February, requesting freedom of worship for all religions. The court rejected the petition and charged legal fees of 25,000 NIS. Gisha, a non-profit organization, has filed a motion to defer these costs, which it calls "unprecedented" and "exceptionally high."

"The courts rarely order the petitioners to pay legal fees, even when the petition is denied," says Gisha. "The human rights community is concerned that the judge's decision is part of the trend towards restricting the activities of human rights organizations."

In the court's judgement, Gisha is referred to, in quotations, as a "human rights" organization. Attorney Nomi Heger wrote that this judgement "hints at a sense of skepticism that Gisha and other similar organizations are indeed primarily concerned with protecting human rights."

Furthermore, the judgement by Justice Bitan invents a new category of "professional petitioners." Gisha has voiced concerns, saying that this sets "a dangerous precedent that potentially shuts the doors of the court to organizations that engage in legal advocacy on behalf of disenfranchised populations."

Since the 1967 Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip, Israel has restricted the movement of 3.4 million Palestinians through a complex system of rules and sanctions.

According to Gisha, these restrictions "violate the fundamental right of Palestinians to freedom of movement," as well as other basic rights, such as the right to freedom of religion.




Back to "Tel Aviv University"Send Response
Top Page
    Developed by Sitebank & Powered by Blueweb Internet Services
    Visitors: 81505404Send to FriendAdd To FavoritesMake It HomepagePrint version
    blueweb