Board & Mission Statement
Why IAM?
About Us
Articles by IAM Associates
Ben-Gurion University
Hebrew University
University of Haifa
Tel Aviv University
Other Institutions
Boycott Calls Against Israel
Israelis in Non-Israeli Universities
Anti-Israel Petitions Supported by Israeli Academics
General Articles
Anti-Israel Conferences
Anti-Israel Academic Resolutions
Lectures Interrupted
Activists Profiles
Readers Forum
On the Brighter Side
How can I complain?
Contact Us / Subscribe
Ben-Gurion University
BGU Conference "Threat: Palestinian Political Prisoners in Israel" Nov 16, with Neve Gordon, Haggai Ram & authors

 Editorial Note:

The BGU conference on the treatment of Palestinian prisoners in Israel is in the tradition of one-sided and biased public events that Professor Neve Gordon and his colleagues are known for organizing.
To begin with, they decided NOT to invite scholars that could have balanced the conference and give it academic credentials, same as the previous non-academic conference organized by Neve Gordon and Dani Filc. The question is, why host a non-academic conference at BGU?

The authors of the book are known to have radical views on the issue.  For instance, in a radio interview on the book, Matar proclaimed that detainees, including those who were held on charge of terrorism, should be reclassified as political prisoners.  The book uses the imagery of Devils's Island, the notorious French penal colony, to imply that Palestinian face hellish conditions in Israeli jails.  In fact, Israel goes beyond the letter of international law by according some Geneva Convention rights to the detainees.
It comes as no surprise that Gordon should organize a one-sided presentation; on previous occasions he made misleading statements on the issue.  
Equality indicative, the book was published by the radical, London-based Pluto Press, a veritable "academic fig leaf" for a long series of anti-Israel and anti-Semitics missives in the tradition of Elders of Zion.   In 2008, the Board of Regents of Michigan University terminated the university's relations with  Pluto Press, accusing it of failure to comport to accepted academic standards.  But then again, for Gordon and many of his activist peers who use academic research to provide legitimacy for their political agenda, Pluto Press is a blessing.

Threat: Political Prisoners in Israel

Date and Time: 
  Wed, 2011-11-16 16:00

Discussion about the book: 'Threat: Palestinian Political Prisoners in Israel'.

Speakers: Anat Matar, 'Abir Baker, Esmail Nashef, Smadar Ben-Natan, Ofer Schiff.

Opening: Prof. Neve Gordon

Moderator: Prof. Haggai Ram



úàøéê åùòä: 
  éåí ã', 2011-11-16 16:00

ãéåï áò÷áåú äñôø:

'Threat: Palestinian Political Prisoners in Israel'.


ãåáøéí: òðú îèø, òáéø áëø, àéñîòéì ðàùó, ñîãø áï-ðúï, òåôø ùéó.






Oct 04 2011


Jadaliyya  Arab Studies institut Washington DC / Beirut

by Laleh Khalili*


Abeer Baker and Anat Matar (eds.), Threat: Palestinian Political Prisoners in Israel. London: Pluto Press, 2011.

There are many harrowing passages in the excellent new edited volume by Abeer Baker and Anat Matar on the processes of administrative detention and imprisonment of Palestinians in Israel; some of them are even in the book’s academic chapters. But the most harrowing, and paradoxically the most hopeful, is the account Osama Barham gives of his endless arrests, detentions, and interrogations. These began in 1979—when he was detained for flying the colors of Palestine in a flag partially made of his mother’s blouse—and ended in 2008, when he was released after a five-year sentence. In the interim, he has been held in detention or in prison (and the distinction is important, as I will describe below) for anything from eighteen days to seven years on separate occasions.

Barham’s story is striking in many different ways: the way he marks the cycles of his life by the periods of detention and imprisonment; the manner in which he has experienced the broad range of confinement practices Israel deploys as its technique of population control; the broader impact of these techniques not just on the confined but on the Palestinian society; and the ease with which law and judicial processes are elided to the control techniques.

It is particularly striking that Barham’s two longest periods of incarceration have been a seven-year sentence after a trial, and a six-and-a-half year administrative detention without trial, where a court continuously renewed his six-month detention order for a total of seventy-eight months. These varieties of politico-legal techniques of incarceration are what the other perennial prisoner interviewed in the book, Sheikh Muhammad Abu Tir, who has spent thirty years, or more than half his life, in Israeli prisons, calls “formats” of a regime of population control. What I am emphasizing here, and what appears again and again throughout this clearly focused, well-written, and immensely useful volume, is that violent limitations on Palestinian bodily freedom has remained constant in the Israeli political arsenal. This has occurred despite all the innovations in techniques of control, all the legal window-dressing and the tedious Israeli discourse of “security” recycled ad nauseum. Perhaps the most enduring characteristic of Israeli settler-colonial counterinsurgency throughout the decades has been a brutal prison regime that is intended to disrupt not just political activism, but lives and communities. The singular essence of the project is what the editors describe as “a blind, categorical” rubric, which transforms all the Palestinians into a “security threat.” The effect is that this incarceration is depoliticized and “all of Palestinian existence is fossilized by means of the ‘security threat’ label, turned into a type of dangerous object for the only subjects around.”

The editors and authors are particularly well placed to make the arguments they do in this volume. Abeer Baker was at the time of editing the book a senior lawyer for Adalah, a legal organisation struggling for equal rights for Palestinian citizens of Israel. Anat Matar has been a tireless activist against the occupation, and is a co-founder of Israeli Committee for the Palestinian Prisoners. The authors in the volume include five former and current Palestinian political prisoners, at least nine lawyers (some also academics) who have defended Palestinian prisoners, and many activists and scholars.

This juxtaposition of academic studies with the measured narratives of the prisoners and their defenders constantly generates productive friction. Just as one settles into the rhythms of academic texts, a raw and distressing account of incarceration injects something of the embodied brutality of incarceration. Barham tells us how his interrogators deliberately tormented him by falsely conveying the news of the death of his wife and small children and maintained the fiction for five weeks. Former female prisoner Ittaf Alian (Hodaly) recounts how her interrogators refused her hygienic pads when she was menstruating. Walid Daka—who is currently serving a life sentence—recounts how the Israeli Prison Service divides the prisoners into ever smaller wards whose boundaries “coincide with the closed enclaves that Israel created” in the Occupied Territories:

a special ward, for the inhabitants of the town of Jenin, and another for prisoners from Jenin’s refugee camp...a ward for prisoners from Qabatiyya and the surrounding villages, one for Tulkarm, and another for Qalqiliya and its villages.

Daka’s account is notable also by its coolly measured and analytically broad focus. The article, about how torture works, is not an account of his personal experience, but rather a reflection on how prisons func'tion to transform prisoners’ subjectivities.

The book brims with useful and fascinating pieces. Some critique the ways in which detention has been embedded in Israeli law and—also—how law has been implicated in detention. Many also look at the ways in which a detailed and chillingly Foucauldian system of categorization and classification attempts to render prisoners helpless and bereft of hope. The question of category appears again and again throughout. Yael Berda’s brilliant piece reflects her former career as a lawyer and her current vocation as a sociologist. She is interested in theorizing the classification process itself and how the bureaucracy around it works to transform entire populations into security threats through “radical simplification, standardization, and homogenization.” Lawyers and legal scholars, meanwhile, question the practice on legal grounds. On the one end of spectrum, and accepting the mainstream legitimacy of the legal system, Alon Harel nevertheless questions the legality of the category of “security prisoner.” Lawyer Smadar Ben-Natan, who in 2006 argued for Hizbullah fighters to be classified as prisoners of war (and thus be protected by a spectrum of international legal instruments), applies the same set of arguments to Palestinian detainees here. On the other end of the spectrum from Harel is researcher Sharon Weill’s argument that law can in fact serve as “an effective tool for exercising arbitrary power.”

Other articles are careful examinations of the processes of interrogation, arrest, and imprisonment. Esmail Nashif, who has written a theoretically rich eponymous monograph on Palestinian political prisoners (Palestinian Political Prisoners: Identity and Community), argues for the importance of material conditions of incarceration in understanding the process. Sahar Francis and Kathleen Gibson, both associated with the Palestinian prisoner rights group Addameer, and feminist psychiatrist Ruchama Marton, all examine isolation and solitary confinement. A number of other articles explore issues such as prisoner transfers (by Michael Sfard), prisoner release (by Leslie Sebba), and prisoner exchanges (by Mounir Mansour). Bana Shoughry-Badarne assiduously examines the persistence of torture in the face of toothless Israel Supreme Court rulings. Tamar Pelleg-Sryck shows how administrative detention also serves as a method of recruiting collaborators and disciplining Palestinians as a whole.

Others still look at the effect of prisoners on the society at large. Maya Rosenfeld, a third of whose careful ethnography of Dheisheh refugee camp in the West Bank, Confronting the Occupation, powerfully examined the effect of imprisonment on camp families, here writes about the centrality of the prisoners in Palestinian struggles. Sigi Ben-Ari and Anat Barsella write about family visits; Nahla Abdo explores women political prisoners. Finally, Alina Korn’s comparison of Israel with Northern Ireland places the Palestinians’ plight in a broader context of settler-colonialism worldwide.

What makes the book succeed as a whole is the adjacency of the legal analyses and academic arguments with the personal accounts. One does wish that Matar and Baker had written a slightly longer introductory essay or provided more articles like Berda’s, with its forensic dissection of the system as a whole. But the book is nevertheless a very welcome and valuable contribution to our understanding of how incarceration has become an inseparable part of the Israeli system of control, discipline, and violence.


Book Content

Preface: The Palestinian Prisoners: Politicization and De-Politicization, by Abeer Baker and Anat Matar 
Notes on Contributors
Part I – Analyses
1 The Centrality of the Prisoners' Movement to the Palestinian Struggle against the Israeli Occupation: A Historical Perspective, by Maya Rosenfeld
2 Towards a Materialist Reading of Political Imprisonment in Palestine, by Esmail Nashef 
3 Who Is a Security Prisoner and Why? An Examination of the Legality of Prison Regulations Governing Security Prisoners, by Alon Harel 
4 The Security Risk as a Security Risk: Notes on the Classification Practices of the Israeli Security Services, by Yael Berda
5 Palestinian Women Political Prisoners and the Israeli State, by Nahla Abdo 
6 Prison Policy and Political Imprisonment in Northern Ireland and Israel, by Alina Korn 
Part II – Arrest, Interrogation, Trial, Release
7 The Arrest and Persecution of Elected Political Leaders Interview with Sheikh Muhammad Abu-Teir, Interviewed by Abeer Baker and Anat Matar 
8 My Arrests, My Interrogations, by Osama Barham 
9 Colonel and Major (poem), by Avigdor Feldman
10 Welcome to Shin Bet Country, by Avigdor Feldman 
11 A Decade after the High Court of Justice “Torture” Ruling, What’s Changed?, by Bana Shoughry-Badarne
12 The Mysteries of Administrative Detention, by Tamar Pelleg-Sryck 
13 Reframing the Legality of the Israeli Military Courts in the West Bank: Military Occupation or Apartheid?, by Sharon Weill 
14 Are There Prisoners in this War?, by Smadar Ben-Natan
15 Institutional Schizophrenia: The Release of "Security Prisoners" in Israel, by Leslie Sebba
16 Prisoner Exchange Deals: Between Figures and Emotions, by Mounir Mansour 
Part III – Inside Prison
17 Females Prisoners and the Struggle: A Personal Testimony, by Ittaf Alian (Hodaly) 
18 Devil's Island: Transfer of Palestinian Detainees into Prisons within Israel, by Michael Sfard
19 Family Visits to Palestinian Prisoners Held inside Israel, by Sigi Ben-Ari and Anat Barsella
20 Isolation and Solitary Confinement of Palestinian Prisoners and Detainees in Israeli Facilities, by Sahar Francis and Kathleen Gibson
21 The Impact of Isolation on Mental Health, by Ruchama Marton 
Consciousness Molded or the Re-Identification of Torture, by Walid Daka

Back to "Ben-Gurion University"Send Response
Top Page
    Developed by Sitebank & Powered by Blueweb Internet Services
    Visitors: 256816667Send to FriendAdd To FavoritesMake It HomepagePrint version