Board & Mission Statement
Why IAM?
About Us
Articles by IAM Associates
Ben-Gurion University
Hebrew University
University of Haifa
Tel Aviv University
Other Institutions
Boycott Calls Against Israel
Israelis in Non-Israeli Universities
Anti-Israel Petitions Supported by Israeli Academics
General Articles
Anti-Israel Conferences
Anti-Israel Academic Resolutions
Lectures Interrupted
Activists Profiles
Readers Forum
On the Brighter Side
How can I complain?
Contact Us / Subscribe
Tel Aviv University
TAU Amal Jamal, SOAS London: The close nationalist and chauvinist meaning of the "Jewishness" of the Israeli state


TAU Dr. Amal Jamal

Political Science



Event Details Day: 16/04/2012 to 16/04/2012

SOAS Palestine Society is pleased to invite you to the following lecture 
sponsored by the Centre for Palestine Studies
"The Jewish State and the Hollowing Out of Palestinian Citizenship"

by Amal Jamal

Chair: Laleh Khalili (SOAS)

Monday 16th April Room B102 6pm

 Dr. Amal Jamal is senior lecturer at the Political Science Department of Tel Aviv University and Director of the Political Communication Graduate Program. He served three years as the chair of the political science department and is currently also the General Director of I'lam- Media Centerfor Arab Palestinians in Israel. He studied English literature and political science at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem and received his Ph.D. in political science from the Free University of Berlin in Germany in 1996. His research fields include political theory and communication, nationalism and democracy, civil society and social movements, indigenous minority politics and civic equality. He has published extensively on Palestinian and Israeli politics inleading international journals. Four of his recent books are: Arab Minority Nationalism in Israel: The Politics of Indigeneity (Routledge 2011); The Arab Public Sphere in Israel: Media Space and Cultural Resistance (Indiana University Press, 2009); The Palestinian National Movement: Politics of Contention, 1967-2005 (Indiana University Press, 2005); Media Politics and Democracy in Palestine (Sussex Academic Press, 2005).


Redefining the Jewish State and the Hollowing Out of Palestinian Citizenship

This paper claims that recent legislative and judicial policies in Israel mirror efforts made to redefine the meaning of the Jewish state. The prospect boarders, the demographic composition, the political culture and the material resources are being remolded in order to meet a close nationalist and chauvinist meaning of the "Jewishness" of the Israeli state. The paper demonstrates how this hegemonic project submits contenders to new forms of governmentality, based on rigid lines of loyalty. It claims that leaders of the project utilize majoritarian despotism in order to redefine the meaning of citizenship, which is reflected in many new legislations that stand in clear contradiction with the identity and political rights of the Palestinian minority in Israel. The Nakba Law, the Citizenship Law, the Boycott Law and the Admission Committees Law are partial examples of the anti-democratic laws that aim to hollow out Arab citizenship from any substantial meaning. The paper also demonstrates how discriminatory demographic planning, housing and geographic zoning policies aim to normalize the hegemonic interpretation of the Jewish identity of the state, as the national home of the entire Jewish people, emptying the principle of civic sovereignty from any democratic meaning. The paper reflects on the legislative activism of the last decade, claiming that it renders Palestinians fragmented and uprooted- floating subgroups in segregated zones, living in continuous and consolidated Jewish space.  The contentious strategy of the Palestinian community to counter Israeli policies has been the priming of its indigenous identity and its demand for full equal civic rights. The paper ends up with demonstrating how the unwillingness of the Jewish majority to accept such demands have made the surveillance and control policies of the state more vicious.


Smearing of pro-Israel questioners gathers pace at SOAS’ Centre for Palestine Studies.

Dr. Amal Jamal is following the path of Omar Bhargouti. Both are academics who have hugely benefited from living in Israel but who then came to London at the first opportunity to question Israel’s existence.

Tel Aviv University must have a death wish because Bhargouti, who would like to boycott Israel out of existence, did his Masters there, and Dr. Jamal, who thinks Israel is heading towards a “one state solution”, is senior lecturer in the Political Science Department there.

Dr. Jamal spoke last night at SOAS on The Jewish State and the Hollowing Out of Palestinian Citizenship. The talk was sponsored by the recently created Centre for Palestine Studies, which is based at SOAS and includes Ilan Pappe as one of its academics.

Another of the Centre’s academics is Professor Gilbert Achcar. Professor Achcar lectures in the Department of Development Studies at SOAS.

Last night’s chairperson, and another of the Centre’s academics, was Dr. Laleh Khalili. Dr. Khalili lectures in the Department of Politics and International Studies at SOAS.

More on both Professor Achcar and Dr Khalili later on.

Dr Jamal introduced his talk by describing the “Zionist narrative” as Jews returning home to a land that was promised by God according to the Bible. But, he said, the Palestinians pose a heavy threat to that narrative.

This, he argued, has led to an Israeli policy of manufacturing “quiet Arabs” and “floating Arabs” who have no ability in Israel to influence what they want to be.

Israel, he said, is doing this by redefining the Jewish state and hollowing out Palestinian citizenship.

Part of this is a mechanism of “Control and Neglect”. “Neglect” means de-developing the Israeli Arabs so they become unequal to other citizens. And “citizenship” as a control mechanism is used to inhibit Israeli Arabs from integrating fully into Israeli life.

He said that in Israel “Jews live. Palestinians exist”.

He criticised the Knesset with its automatic majority that can enact any law. Other tools used included separation and “the racist Wall” and other walls being built in Lod and Caesarea. The citizenship law, the boycott law and the Nakba law were other examples as well as the limiting of resources for Israeli Arabs and the removal of citizenship in cases of treason.

Dr. Jamal concluded his talk by saying that the Jewish state is a hegemonic project that cannot tolerate contention and that this will eventually lead to its breakdown and that Israeli policies will close off any hope of a two state solution, eventually leading to a “one state solution”.

During the Q&A events took a turn for the worse.

I asked Dr Jamal why, if as he stated, Israeli Arabs could not influence their future in Israel then how had he become so successful there. I then went on to suggest that at least in Israel the Arabs had a chance to argue their case while in the surrounding Arab countries Arab citizens were either being slaughtered or undergoing the imposition of strict Islamic laws.

Dr Khalili thought this second point off-topic and tried to shout me down. Next someone shouted “This is Hasbarah. It is crap”. When I tried to defend my right to ask a question Professor Achcar, who was sat in the front row, referred to me as a “professional disruptor” to which Dr Khalili replied “I know, I remember”.

Then, quite incredibly, Professor Achcar announced to the room that I had left insults on his phone and that had he known I was coming he would not have allowed me in. He told me to get out.

I realised afterwards that this is the second time he has asked me to leave a talk.In February 2011 exactly the same happened when he didn’t like my questioning of Shlomo Sand (also of Tel Aviv University, incidentally) at SOAS.

Afterwards Professor Achcar told me that he still has the recordings of the insulting phone messages.

If he can prove that they are from me I will donate £1000 to a charity of his choice. Alternatively, he might have the decency to apologise.

I never got a proper answer from Dr Jamal as to why he had succeeded while other Israeli Arabs hadn’t. He just said that Israeli Jews must be saved from enacting policies of apartheid, expulsion and genocide. He said Jews can change but that the Jewish community in Britain has an important role to play as Israeli Jews  can’t save themselves on their own.

He also said that he wanted the right of return but for it to be controlled at first both for Jews and Arabs. Eventually, he said, up to 20 million people must be somehow accommodated.

For the Palestinian “right of return” read Israel’s destruction. And this from someone being paid by Israel to teach Israeli students!

Meanwhile, I was proud to study at SOAS and I contributed financially when I was recently telephoned to help current students. It’s now very sad that some anti-Israel SOAS lecturers are using smear tactics when they don’t like what they hear.

Back to "Tel Aviv University"Send Response
Top Page
    Developed by Sitebank & Powered by Blueweb Internet Services
    Visitors: 257017813Send to FriendAdd To FavoritesMake It HomepagePrint version