Israel Academia Monitor received comments to ouráletter to TAU Governors.áThose comments follow our responses below.á
Dear Professor Israel Bartal,
Thank you for your letter in response to our post about some faculty at TeláAviv University.
You are right that academics have the right to write, research, learn andádoáwhatever they want and, furthermore, they can do it under the protection ofáthe authorities of the universities. á
But we think you misunderstood our statement. á
IAM does not dispute that scholars have a right to express their opinion however vexing it may be to others, and that this is their right asácitizens as well as academics. áIndeed, there are literally hundred ofáscholars who have done so. We fully agree that it is to the credit ofáIsraeli democracy that they can enjoy their freedoms withoutáharassment and without the fear of losing their jobs.
However, we clearly pointed out that the mentioned faculty do more thanáexpress their opinion in their free time. áThey were appointed to teach andáresearch in particular fields but, upon receiving tenure, moved on toáresearching aspects of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict because it fitsátheir political agenda.
Surely, you would agree that a university cannot allow their faculty toáresearch whatever they want to, especially when the subject is not evenáremotely related to the specialization for which they were hired. áWe wantáto remind you that the report of the Council of Higher Education (CHE)áregarding the Department of Politics and Government at Ben GurionáUniversity, considered it problematic that many on the staff did notáresearch on topics that they taught. In other words, the CHE concluded thatáacademic freedoms have to be limited to the domain of specialization, evenáif broadly defined.
There is a reason for requiring faculty to research within the broadáconfines of their field of expertise. áFirst, it has been determined thatáclassroom instruction is greatly enhanced by relevant research experienceáof the teaching staff. Only non-research colleges do not require their lecturers to research and publish, effectivelyáseveringáthe link between teaching and research. áSecond, by allowing facultyáfreedomáof research well outside their discipline, the university (and society) isárobbedáof research on topics that are deemed important and for which positionsáwereácreated in the first place. áThird, permissive practices deprive studentsáof a meaningful educational experience that they have the right to expectáin a research university as opposed to a non-research college. á
To conclude, it would seem to us that you confuse political freedom ofáacademics to express and write what they want with the academicáresponsibility to teach and research within the confines of theiráexpertise. áSurely, you would not suggest that a scholar who was hired toáteach and research, say, neurobiology, would switch to exploring theábotanical structure of plants. áIf so, why would you support the right ofásomeone appointed to teach sociology of organizations to make a career outá"proving" that Mizrahim are Arab Jews and victims of Zionism to boot?
■■ţÓ˙: Israel Bartal "firstname.lastname@example.org"
■■¨ýš: ■■ÚňÝ šţÚ¨Ú 07 ÚňÚ 2012 17:21
■■Óý: IAM e-mail
■■ň¨Ó: ■■Óň˙ ŰßňŃ ý÷Úňň˙ ňýţŃÚ˙ Ú¨°Óý
˛ţÚ˙ÚÝ/˛ţÚ˙ň˙ á ŰßŃÚÝ/ ŰßŃň˙,
ýţ°ň˙ ¨ÓÚ °šň¸ ţÓŃ ţŃ˛ň˙ÚńÝ ňţń¨¸˘ň˙ÚńÝ ¨ý ń˘°ň˘˝ň°ÚÝ ńŰßŃÚÝ ńţňÚÚÝ ßţŰ˙ßŰÝ ¨ń˛˙¸ň ¨ýš ÓýÚ, ÓÚ šňý¸ ýšýňŔÚ´ ˛ý ń˛ţŃń ¨ń÷Ô˙Ý ßţŰ˙ßŰÝ ß˛ÚÚ´ ŠŰň˙Ý ¨ý Ó¸ŃţÓÚÝ Óýń ýńßÚ˛ Ó˙ ˛ţŃň˙ÚńÝ.
šÚ°ň˙ Ó¸ŃţÚ˙ ˘°ň¨ń ńšň˘¨ ýŰ˙ňß, ý˘°˝Ý, ýš¸ň° ňýýţŃ. Ú˙Ú°ń ţŠÓ˙, ń˛ňßŃń ¨¨ÚÝ ňÓ¨ÚÝ Óýń á˛ň¨ÚÝ ŠÓ˙ ýýÓ ń˘°˛ń, ňńÚÝ ţńÔ˙ ţň˝Ńň˙ ńÓňÚß°˝ÚŔń ˛ý šÚ°ň˙Ý ńÓ¸ŃţÚ˙ áńÚÓ Óň˙ ŰßňŃ ýÓ¸ŃţÚń ńÚ¨°ÓýÚ˙ ňţ¨ţ¨˙ ŃňÔţń ňţň˘˙ ýÚÚšňŃń ¨ý ţŃÚ˙ Ú¨°Óý ŰţŃÚń Ńţň¸°ŔÚ˙, šň˘¨Ú˙ ň˘˙ňšń - ţŃÚń ÚšÚŃń ţ˝ňÔń ßÚ´ ¨Űň˙Úń.
áÓÚ á°ňÓń ßšÚ°ň˙ ńÓ¸ŃţÚ˙ ßţŃÚ˙ Ú¨°Óý áńňŰšń ß°ň°ń ý÷šňń ¨ý ń÷Úňň˙: ˙ň˛ń ¨ń¨ŰÚýń ˙ţÚŃ ýÓ˘¨° ţÚÔňň´ °šß ¨ý Ń˛ň˙ ň˛ţŃň˙ ßţ˝Ô°˙ ŃÚň´ ˘˙ňš ňšň˘¨Ú.
ÓňÚ ý÷Úňň˙ ňýţŃÚ˙ Ú¨°Óý ÓÝ ńţň˘˙ ¨ý ˝ň°Úń Óň ¨ý °ň˝Úń ß˛ÚÚÚ šň˘¨ Ó¸ŃţÚ ÚšýÚˇ Ó˙ ˛ţŃň˙ ń°÷ý, ß´ Ôň°Úň´ ňßÔÚ´. ß¨Óý˙ ńšÚ°ň˙ ńÓ¸ŃţÚ˙.
ÓňŃń ýŰÝ ÓÝ ˙˘Ú÷ň Ó˙ ţŰ˙ßÚ ßÚ´ ¸ň°ÓÚ Ó˙°ŰÝ ńŰßŃ.
˘°ň˘' Ú¨°Óý ß°Ŕý
Department of Jewish History
Faculty of Humanities
Dear Professor Leshem,
We have received comments on our post about Tel Aviv professors and are trying to respond.á
You are right !áWe agree with you that there is nothing wrong with criticizing Israel. As a matter of fact, we are proud that Israel is a democratic society in which citizens and academics alike can criticize the state.
But your comment about us "totally losing it" seems based on a misunderstanding of our post.á Our point was that this particular faculty stopped doing research in their own field and turned to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict because it fit their political agenda. As we pointed out in a reply to Professor Israel Bar-Tal, the Council for Higher Education condemned such practices with regard to theáDepartment of Government at Ben Gurion University.
Let usáexplaináthe difference between free speech and abuse of academic responsibility.
Professor Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi from your own Department of Psychology at Haifa University. á In the late 1980s, Beit-Hallahmi, a member of Matzpen, took a Sabbatical leave to do research, not in psychology, but on Israel's military connections with right wing states, including the then apartheid regime of South Africa. The fruit of his Sabbatical labor wasáThe Secret Connection: Whom Israel Arms and Why, published in 1988. As you should know, the universities cover the Sabbatical leave.
There are many more instances where professors, at least temporality, turned to topics that had nothing to do with their expertise but everything to do with their political activism.á For instance, Professor Galia Golan, then an expert on the Soviet Union at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, "remade" herself into an authority on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, a topic that conviently matched her position as a spokesperson for Peace Now.
We hope that you would agree with our distinction between academic freedom of expression and abuse of such freedomsáas described in our original post.ááThe practices ofádramatic research "reorientation"áby faculty shows contempt for liberal arts students (humanities and social sciences) who are expected toáaccept standards that would have never been tolerated in sciences and engineering.
Israeli universities which are globally competitive in sciences and engineering, are badly lagging in international rankings in social sciences.áCutting edge topics, say, the sociology of water or the sociology of the high-techásector are not covered because many of the facultyáareáusing their academic positions to do work that enhances their political agenda.á
-------- Original Message --------
||RE: To the Governors of Tel Aviv University
||Thu, 7 Jun 2012 12:42:11 +0300
||micah leshem "email@example.com"á
Nothing wrong with criticizing Israel. You've totally lost it.