Home
Search
Board & Mission Statement
Why IAM?
About Us
Articles by IAM Associates
On the Brighter Side
Ben-Gurion University
Hebrew University
University of Haifa
Tel Aviv University
Other Institutions
Boycott Calls Against Israel
Israelis in Non-Israeli Universities
Anti-Israel Petitions Supported by Israeli Academics
General Articles
Lawfare
Activists Profiles
Readers Forum
Photographs
Anti-Israel Conferences
How can I complain?
Contact Us / Subscribe
Donate
Number of visitors to IAM
Hebrew University
[HUJ, Literature] Hannan Hever "The Nakba is a question of responsibility"

Hanan Hever


Literature


Faculty of Humanities
: hever26@mscc.huji.ac.il Email

Editorial Note:
Hannan Hever, a professor of literature at HUJ and a radical activist,added his comments on the exchange between Yehuda Bauer and Mohammed Bakrion the role of the Holocaust in creating the State of Israel.Hever's arguments are disingenuous at best and deceptive at worse.
As a co-founder in 1988 of "The 21th Year"which issued the first call to "total resistance to occupation," Heverhas been a faithful disciple of the anti-Zionist Matzpen line that Arabs and Palestinians have been innocents (and passive) victims of the "nefarious machinations" of the Zionists-colonialist movement. In fact, Hever has devoted a considerable part of his academic careertocreatingan equation between theNakba and the Holocaust.
Had Hever been forthcoming about the origin of the 1948 war, he would have to admit that by rejecting the 1947 UN Partition Proposal and starting a war against the Jewish community, the Palestinians were the authors of their own disaster. In terms of International Relations theory (IR), the Palestinians were a "losing belligerent,"not unlikeNazi Germanythat hosted the Palestinian leader Haj Amin al Husseini in Berlin.
Had Hever been more familiar with IR, he would have to admit that"losing belligerents" do not fare well. Millions of Germans were expelled from territories that Germany lost to the former Soviet Union and Poland. Millions more were expelled from the former Czechoslovakia because they sided with Hitler. Even when belligerency is not the case, majorpolitical convulsions can produce huge population shifts as thehistory of India and Pakistan indicates.
But then again, Hever may have an ulterior motive; by pushing for the right to return of the Palestinians, hehopes to fulfill the long-term Matzpen dream of creating a binational Jewish-Palestinian state.


Haaretz

The Nakba is a question of responsibility

Israel was not established because of the Holocaust, but that doesn't mean it isn't responsible for the suffering its creation caused the Palestinians.

ByHannanHeverJun.07, 2012 | 1:41 PM|

On May 23 in these pages, Professor Yehuda Bauer wrote an open letter to Palestinian director and actor Mohammad Bakri in response to Bakri's public assertion that Israel was only created because of the Holocaust.

Bakri made his statement at an event marking Nakba ("catastrophe") Day which Palestinians commemorate annually on the anniversary of Israel's establishment.

In the piece, "Israel didnt come into being because of the Shoah; Israel exists in spite of it," Bauer claims that Israel was established thanks to a diplomatic breakthrough, not the Holocaust and not feelings of guilt toward the Jewish people. His assertion is magnificently constructed and convincing.

With it, he has helped shift the discourse about the Nakba and the Holocaust from the area of myth to that of history, allowing for a fairer, more direct investigation of the topic.

Still, Bauers impressive claim misses the historical question that Bakri poses that of Israels responsibility for the Nakba.

It is not important whether or not the Holocaust caused the establishment of the State of Israel. Neither is the fact that the State of Israel gave refuge to a substantial number of Holocaust survivors, rehabilitating them in buildings and towns that were, in essence, Palestinian ruins. It seems there can be no historical argument over this fact.

Because of this historical fact, which to this day allows the Holocaust to be used as a justification for the State of Israels existence (even if it was not the cause of its establishment), Israel bears heavy responsibility.

This responsibility stems, in part, from the fact that it is Israel's own leaders who are making connections between the Holocaust and the establishment of the state. And the state is responsible for the Nakba. For example, these leaders invoke the Holocaust to justify potential military action against Iran.

And Israels responsibility for the Nakba does not stop at the events of 1948. The Nakba, which is ongoing, is only getting worse and for that, Israel is culpable.

It does not matter whether, in 1948, the Palestinians fled their homes or were driven from them. What matters is that when the dust settled, they were not allowed to return. Even if Israel's establishment is not connected to the Holocaust, Israel took in Jewish refugees while creating Palestinian ones. That that creates an undeniable connection between the Holocaust and the state's creation.

It was because of the Holocaust that Israel's leaders felt the need to establish the State of Israel as a Jewish state. This state guards its Jewish character by, among other tactics, continuing to oppose the Palestinian right of return.

Like many Israelis, Bauer understands that it takes more than just empathy for the Palestinian disaster to accept responsibility for the Nakba. He knows that this is a responsibility that demands expression in the practical realms of law and justice in other words, by recognizing the right of return and entering into negotiations about how that right will look in practice.

It seems that this is why he would rather deflect the debate to the historical clarification of the role played by the state in the making, which existed before the Holocaust, and to the diplomatic factors that enabled the establishment of the State of Israel.

But the painful and real question, the one that is both historical and moral, is what role the Holocaust played, and continues to play, in the State of Israels existence and actions. This is, after all, the same country that refuses to recognize its responsibility for the Nakba for fear that recognizing of the right of return could compromise its Jewish character.

ProfessorHannanHeveristhe Head of the School of Literature at the Hebrew University.



Back to "Hebrew University"Send Response
Top Page
Your Responses
    1.  Hever's ignorance is awesome. And
     From , Sent in 15-07-2012
    2.  As expected Hever does not
     From , Sent in 16-07-2012
    Developed by Sitebank & Powered by Blueweb Internet Services
    Visitors: 109950617Send to FriendAdd To FavoritesMake It HomepagePrint version
    blueweb