As part of Israel on Campus Coalition’s (ICC) mission to provide partner organizations and
stakeholders with an updated and realistic picture of the Israel environment on U.S. campuses,
ICC tracks thousands of Israel-related events at colleges and universities each semester. We
collect reports from our national partner organizations, local campuses, and open-source
material. ICC analysts use this data to identify trends and assess changing needs at individual
campuses and across the broader campus community.
The fall 2015 semester was a critical time for Israel on campus. In a central development on
American campuses, anti-Israel groups maximized the benefits of existing coalitions, capitalizing
on partnerships formed during previous years. Efforts to collaborate with fellow campus groups
sparked dramatic changes in the BDS movement, with anti-Israel students contributing to causes
unrelated to Israel. Cooperation between Israel’s detractors and their allies resulted in shared
ideological platforms, with students issuing joint “lists of demands” to campus administrations. By
expanding relationships with campus and community partners, BDS supporters broadened the
reach of their activism. This development posed a significant challenge for pro-Israel students,
who must redouble their efforts to build relationships on American campuses.
As BDS advocates strengthened ties with allies, they evolved their approaches to anti-Israel
activism. Throughout the fall 2015 semester, anti-Israel activists launched sophisticated attacks
against pro-Israel students and campus administrators. Professional groups provided significant
support for these efforts, providing students with legal support and strategic guidance. At the
same time, anti-Israel students increased their dependence on aggressive tactics, staging
dramatic protests and publicizing their efforts through online media.
Despite increased collaboration and coalition-building, the fall 2015 semester marked a period of
considerable division in the anti-Israel campus movement. A growing minority of student activists,
primarily on the East Coast, began to challenge the role of BDS initiatives in anti-Israel advocacy.
Criticism of divestment sparked tense debate among Israel's detractors, with campus groups
engaging in public arguments on the value and efficacy of BDS efforts. Alongside these vocal
disagreements, subtle ideological differences created rifts among anti-Israel activists, dividing
students over the Syrian civil war and other issues.
These developments coincided with broad structural changes in the anti-Israel movement.
During its national conference in October 2015, Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) – a major
anti-Israel group with more than 150 campus chapters – transformed its leadership model and
strategic orientation. By creating an executive board and adopting its first national agenda, SJP
initiated its transition from a grassroots organization to a structured advocacy movement. This
shift marked a critical change for the student group, strengthening its ability to lead coordinated
efforts across the country.
As anti-Israel students evolve their tactics, pro-Israel students are pushing forward with effective
advocacy initiatives. Throughout the fall semester, pro-Israel campus groups expanded their
activism, organizing proactive campaigns in nearly every part of the country. ICC and its
partners will continue to support the efforts of Israel’s campus advocates, recognizing that
student contributions remain critical to the greater pro-Israel movement. Through the
implementation of forward-thinking strategies, pro-Israel students can minimize the impact of
BDS and deepen support for Israel on American campuses.
PRO-ISRAEL AND ANTI-ISRAEL
ACTIVITY Fall 2015
The following analysis summarizes campus detractor and supporter events1 during the fall 2015
semester relative to previous years. ICC analyzed campus activity based on the number of
schools affected, the geographic regions in which events took place, and types of pro-Israel
and anti-Israel activity. The analysis also includes assessments of campus opinion articles,
popular anti-Israel speakers, and actors outside the pro-Israel and anti-Israel movements.
During the fall 2015 semester, ICC recorded a drop in the number of detractor events relative to
2014, with anti-Israel activity returning to levels observed in previous years. The decline
underscores the impact of Israel’s 2014 operation in Gaza, which triggered an unusually high
number of anti-Israel events during the fall 2014 semester. Despite an overall decrease in
detractor activity, a higher percentage of anti-Israel events attracted sponsorship from groups
unrelated to Israel, reflecting the impact of coalition-building among BDS activists. Finally, ICC
analysts tracked a significant increase in pro-Israel events – including rallies, lectures, and tabling
activities – with terrorism against Israelis prompting a national trend of solidarity on U.S.
Despite an overall decline in detractor activity relative to the 2014 fall semester, the
number of schools affected by anti-Israel events increased slightly in 2015.
Reduced detractor activity likely reflects the exceptional effect of Israel’s 2014 Gaza
operation. Another explanation lies in SJP’s coalition-building efforts, which have focused
increasingly on issues unrelated to Israel.
ICC has observed an increase in supporter activity, noting a rise in pro-Israel events
during the recent wave of terrorist attacks in Israel. The increase reflects a steady rise in
the supporter community’s campus footprint, which has expanded by about 20 percent
each year since 2012.
There was a net decrease in anti-Israel campus activity in geographic regions across the
By contrast, we have seen a steady increase in the amount of pro-Israel campus activity
across all geographic regions. New England saw the largest increase in pro-Israel
campus activity during the fall semester.
ICC recorded a rise in the number of anti-Israel rallies and demonstrations relative to the
fall 2014 semester. This increase suggests anti-Israel groups are once again turning to
protests, street theater, and public demonstrations to gain increased sympathy for their
The number of campus BDS campaigns declined in fall 2015, returning to the levels
observed in 2012 and 2013. The fall 2014 semester saw an exceptionally high number of
BDS campaigns, most likely a reaction to Israel’s operation in Gaza.
The number of pro-Israel rallies and demonstrations on campus has nearly tripled relative
to the fall 2014 semester. This surge in visible pro-Israel activity is likely tied to terrorist
attacks in Israel and SJP’s National Day of Action, which prompted students to respond
by demonstrating support for the Jewish state.
ICC also observed increased participation in professional training sessions for pro-Israel
activists. Students expressed a growing interest in pro-Israel advocacy, taking advantage
of opportunities to broaden their knowledge and increase their skills.
Top Detractor Speakers by Number of Campus Speaking Engagements
During the fall 2015 semester, the following speakers appeared on U.S. campuses to promote
BDS and other anti-Israel themes:
-Remi Kanazi spoke at 25 campuses during the fall semester. The anti-Israel activist and
author performed poetry from his new book Before the Bomb Drops, a compilation of
poems about “life under Israeli ‘occupation,’” which also explores issues such as racism,
police brutality, militarism, colonialism, and Islamophobia. A prominent BDS supporter,
Kanazi has appeared several times as a featured lecturer at national SJP conferences.
He speaks frequently on Palestinian identity, “black-Palestine solidarity,” and other issues
related to Israel.
-David Sheen spoke at seven campuses during the fall semester. In a lecture series titled
“Israel & Palestine: The Bullet, The Ballot & The Boycott,” Sheen accused Israel of “racial
violence” and criticized Israeli leaders for using aggressive and barbarian rhetoric.
Working as a journalist in Israel, Sheen focuses most of his writing on racism faced by
Ethiopian immigrants, asylum seekers, migrant workers, and other groups. His work
frequently describes Israel as an apartheid state responsible for the oppression of non-
-Bassem Tamimi visited four campuses as part of a month-long speaking tour during the
fall semester. Tamimi, a native of the West Bank, spoke to students about his involvement
in organizing violent riots against Israeli soldiers.
ICC views student group sponsorship of campus events as the product of deliberate coalition-
building. As such, ICC closely monitors the sponsorship of Israel-related campus events.
A significant number of student groups have joined anti-Israel causes on American
campuses, offering support to detractor groups such as SJP. Fifty-one campus groups
unaffiliated with Israel supported 58 anti-Israel events (with detractor events totaling 649).
As in previous years, pro-Israel students co-sponsored events with College Democrats,
College Republicans, fraternities, sororities, and other campus groups. Forty-five campus
groups without a direct focus on Israel sponsored or co-sponsored 54 pro-Israel events
(with supporter events totaling 1,857).
EMERGING ANTI-ISRAEL TRENDS
Amid the current wave of general unrest on U.S. college campuses, SJP and its allies have
doubled down on a strategy of co-opting the broader protest movement. Having enjoyed
relatively limited success in securing passage of BDS resolutions and referenda on college
campuses, a frustrated and opportunistic SJP has inserted anti-Israel language into the public
demonstrations and grievance platforms of these campus agitators. These efforts constitute a
defining trend within the anti-Israel movement, reshaping the strategy and reach of Israel’s
detractors on American campuses.
Collaboration between BDS supporters and other activists reflects the growing popularity of
intersectionality, a worldview that describes the ways in which systems of oppression intersect
and interact. Intersectionality on American campuses has united student groups around
common themes of oppression, motivating them to establish shared goals and agendas. This
trend has emerged as a defining feature of anti-Israel activism, prompting BDS activists to
connect their causes with the demands of self-defined oppressed groups on campus. Anti-Israel
organizations have exploited intersectionality to advance Palestinian narratives, drawing
comparisons between anti-Israel grievances and broad social justice causes.
During the past three academic years, shared narratives have allowed BDS activists to expand
outreach to fellow student organizers. Throughout the fall 2015 semester, BDS supporters
capitalized on this growing network, launching unprecedented initiatives on American
campuses. By exploiting years of coalition-building efforts, anti-Israel groups merged their
agendas with those of fellow organizations. In many cases, these efforts produced shared issue
platforms, which combined anti-Israel demands with support for other causes.
On several campuses, student organizations compiled joint “lists of demands,” confronting
campus administrators with common grievances among students. Anti-Israel groups relied on
these lists as important channels of influence, exploiting the visibility of other causes in order to
promote their own. In some cases, these demands reflected the priorities of BDS activists,
Carolina, Greensboro, for example, demanded that the institution “join the growing movement
promoting divestment initiatives alongside unrelated goals. A list from the University of North
of divestment from companies and other financial entities profiting from fossil fuels, private
prisons, and the Israeli Occupation of Palestine.” Students from Oberlin College
called for “an
increase in black administrators and faculty” alongside “divestment from all prisons and Israel.”
For more than a year, ICC has closely monitored SJP's efforts to build relationships with minority
groups on American campuses. During the fall semester, ICC marked a significant increase in
enforcement action against African Americans. Collaboration between the movements
followed years of close ties, including three national SJP conferences that highlighted outreach
to black communities as their central theme.
Following events at the University of Missouri, SJP Midwest – which represents 22 SJP chapters –
released a statement
in support of the school’s black students. A short time later, a black
student group at Loyola University Chicago published a statement calling on the university's
administration to divest from "corporations profiting [from] human rights abuses in Palestine."
Loyola students combined their calls for divestment with demands for other reforms, including
the increased hiring of black faculty and cultural-sensitivity training.
Upon calling for racial justice at Northwestern University (NU), the school’s Black Lives Matter
Facebook, the group demanded that administrators respect “the goal of divesting from
chapter highlighted provisions of a BDS resolution passed last year. In a statement published on
corporations profiting off human rights violations, especially those occurring in Palestine.”
British security company that services Israeli prisons. The campaign received support from SJP,
Black Lives Matter NU, and MEChA de Northwestern, a campus group committed to fighting
racial and ethnic oppression. Throughout the fall, the groups accused G4S of enabling the
torture of Palestinian prisoners, as well as the cruel detainment of migrants illegally crossing the
sponsored by Students for a Free Palestine (SFP). Support from black students reflected
increased cooperation between the two groups, including anti-Israel participation in Black
Student Union demonstrations. During the fall semester, SFP joined forces
with Oberlin Fossil Fuel
Divest, introducing divestment initiatives that were ultimately rejected by the school’s board of
On several East Coast campuses, SJP chapters supported the Million Student March, a
movement that promotes minimum-wage increases, tuition reform, and greater support for
victims of sexual assault. During a rally at Temple University,
SJP students added anti-Israel
demands to the movement’s agenda, demanding that Temple divest from companies tied to
the “illegal military occupation of Palestine.” Activists also called on the university to criticize U.S.
policy toward Israel.
In November 2015, during a Million Student March rally involving activists from City University of
with the anti-Israel interjections, criticizing SJP activists for co-opting the rally’s agenda.
During the fall 2015 semester, No Red Tape – a Columbia University group devoted to
anti-Israel groups. The organization defended its positions by highlighting similarities between the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict and sexual violence on American campuses. While some students
supported the group’s comparison, its position sparked a backlash across the country, attracting
broad criticism and media attention. A news article
by The Daily Beast quoted several women
who condemned the organization’s decision, including a group member who claimed the
move had “effectively politicized anti-sexual violence work” at Columbia.
Collaboration between No Red Tape and anti-Israel students reflects previous examples of
group that supports divestment from private prisons – co-sponsored and advertised SJP’s Israel
Apartheid Week. ICC has observed significant crossover between the two groups, with many
students participating in both organizations.
Left unchecked, the growing popularity of intersectionality could lend additional legitimacy to
SJP and its allies. This trend is likely to define the anti-Israel movement in the near future, with
students devoting more of their efforts to joint “lists of demands” than BDS resolutions. ICC
believes it is an important strategic priority for pro-Israel activists to refocus on building
meaningful personal relationships across the campus community in order to block further SJP
Throughout the fall semester, efforts connected with intersectionality extended beyond the
college campus. Anti-Israel groups broadened their collaboration with surrounding communities,
establishing common cause with local activists. Community participation gained considerable
momentum in New York, Boston, and Philadelphia, where SJP’s local chapters met frequently
with community activists and planned joint initiatives. In all three cities, community engagement
transformed SJP’s organizational model, expanding opportunities for involvement beyond the
campus. SJP invested significant resources in these efforts, engaging community members
through e-mail lists and social media. At the same time, community members initiated outreach
to SJP, seeking opportunities to cooperate with the student group.
On the West Coast, cooperation between campuses and communities played an important role
in promoting local BDS initiatives. In Berkeley, California, and Portland, Oregon, anti-Israel
students enthusiastically supported BDS resolutions in local governmental bodies, asking both
municipalities to divest from Israel. Although the measures failed, they demonstrated the
usefulness of community outreach as a tool for influencing decision-makers.
Throughout the fall 2015 semester, anti-Israel activists staged aggressive demonstrations and
Palestine Solidarity Committee (PSC) released doctored footage of a lecture hosted by the UT
Institute for Israel Studies. After disrupting the event, PSC activists accosted audience members
and repeatedly shouted “Long live the Intifada” over the event’s featured lecturer. In the PSC
video of the incident, students distorted a professor’s reaction to their provocation, portraying his
response as an attack. On the basis of the doctored video, the anti-Israel students provoked
national outrage and generated an ongoing ordeal for staff and students of the Institute for
SJP and SJP-affiliated groups have also garnered national media attention for a series of event
disruptions occurring on campuses in Minnesota, Maryland, and Massachusetts. In each of these
incidents, anti-Israel students and non-student activists have interrupted lecturers or guest
speaker, shouting for more than 45 minutes before being arrested.
Public displays of anti-Israel activism represent a shift from passive tactics employed by SJP
members in previous years. During the fall semester, SJP chapters at Boston University and
University of California, Santa Cruz staged public "die-ins" and rallies during which demonstrators
used hostile language and attracted attention from media outlets.
The second annual “National Day of Action for Palestine,” held on October 14, 2015, constituted
a significant example of anti-Israel protest during the fall 2015 semester. The 2015 Day of Action
featured large-scale rallies, die-ins, flyering campaigns, and other anti-Israel activities. Day of
Action events were observed on 32 U.S. campuses this school year, an increase of 370% from
2014, when Day of Action events were held on seven campuses.
The 2015 Day of Action immediately followed the fifth annual National Students for Justice in
Palestine Conference in San Diego, California, which was attended by approximately 250 anti-
Israel campus activists from around the country. Anti-Israel activists collaborated with the black-
Palestinian solidarity campaign, releasing a solidarity video that gained significant traction on
social media. A Day of Action event at University of California, Berkeley, in which a large crowd
chanted "Intifada, intifada, we support the intifada,” was captured on video and posted to
On several campuses, BDS activists organized strategic campaigns to attack and marginalize
Jewish students. Anti-Israel groups demanded that Jewish leaders refrain from participating in
student government, arguing that support for Israel would compromise their ability to serve as
also the vice president of the school's Jewish Student Union – was told to abstain from voting on
a BDS resolution, asserting he had been elected by “a Jewish agenda.” Students at the
representative who criticized an anti-Israel campus display following a terrorist attack in Israel.
BDS activists targeted pro-Israel students with the help of professional organizations, some of
which provide legal advice to Israel’s detractors. One such group, Palestine Legal, regularly
publicizes its role in securing “victories” for anti-Israel students. In addition to offering legal
guidance, the organization designs strategies for political influence on campus, including efforts
to punish pro-Israel representatives. During the fall semester, the group counseled several anti-
Israel activists, helping them file harassment complaints against pro-Israel students. Many of
these allegations portrayed BDS supporters as victims of “Zionist bullying” while distracting from
anti-Israel extremism on campus.
Palestine Legal employs a range of legal tactics to advance anti-Israel objectives. One of the
organization’s most common approaches is “baiting,” a tactic designed to provoke negative
reactions from university officials. At The George Washington University (GWU), one student
university policy – which prohibits hanging items outside residence halls – GWU officials asked the
student to remove the flag from his window. With the help of Palestine Legal, the student filed a
discrimination claim against GWU, prompting a public apology from the university’s president.
On its website, Palestine Legal framed the incident as a triumph over censorship, describing the
president’s statement as a “victory” for pro-Palestinian students.
The fall 2015 semester saw increased collaboration between SJP and Jewish Voice for Peace
(JVP). A natural ally of SJP and other groups, JVP maintains strong connections to community
resources and a network of national staff devoted to anti-Israel activism. Establishing a separate
organization for Jewish anti-Israel activists allows SJP to preserve its identity as a Palestinian
Before the start of the fall semester, JVP hired its first full-time employee dedicated to campus
affairs. The fall semester saw a surge in JVP’s activities after student governments recognized its
hosting 25 student representatives from 15 campus chapters. Throughout the semester, JVP
steadily evolved as an outlet for Jewish involvement in anti-Israel activism. The organization is
expected to grow in the coming months, having recently announced plans to establish 50
campus chapters across the country.
Anti-Israel media channels
Throughout the fall semester, students promoted anti-Israel activities using Internet platforms and
student-run website popular among critics of Israel. The website’s writers – all SJP students –
published content related to campus and local events. The website constitutes the first anti-Israel
outlet of its kind, generating content exclusively produced by SJP. Students used the website
and other platforms to trumpet the success of BDS events on campus, creating an “echo effect”
within the anti-Israel movement. The frequent promotion of anti-Israel initiatives emboldened BDS
supporters, reinforcing their sense of achievement and encouraging anti-Israel activism.
Footage of students disrupting pro-Israel speakers – disseminated through Palestine in America
and other outlets – proved effective in spreading anti-Israel sentiment during the fall semester.
Anti-Israel videos fueled criticism despite their misleading content. In a few cases, the
proliferation of anti-Israel images aided recruitment efforts, helping activists expand outreach
and attract new supporters.
DIVISIONS IN THE ANTI-ISRAEL
The fall 2015 semester marked a period of tense division within the anti-Israel movement. Even as
SJP cemented its national strategy and leadership structure, disagreements obstructed
consensus-building efforts among campus activists. While most students characterized BDS as
the chief objective of anti-Israel efforts, others described it as insufficient to achieve the
movement’s broader goals. A growing minority of SJP activists identified divestment as a
distraction, asserting that BDS had caused activists to neglect more overt efforts to attack and
isolate Israel and its supporters.
On the East Coast, SJP members publicly disputed the effectiveness of BDS, challenging the
views of mainstream activists. Proponents of this view criticized an excessive focus on BDS
resolutions, defining “Palestinian solidarity” as the movement’s most significant aim. Activists in
this camp urged students to consider alternative means of “supporting Palestinian resistance,”
expressing a preference for protests and community mobilization. A growing faction stressed the
value of partnerships with campus minority groups. They encourage students to “participate in
the struggles of oppressed peoples.” Mainstream activists interpreted these calls as explicit
attacks on BDS, leading to friction among anti-Israel students and community members.
In December, a public dispute between SJP New York City and the Palestinian Students
Campaign for the Academic Boycott of Israel (PSCABI) reflected core disagreements in the anti-
article urging students to divert support for divestment resolutions to community outreach efforts.
Israel movement. Weeks before SJP’s national conference, SJP New York City published an
The post argued that “a near-exclusive focus on BDS” had prevented efforts to secure the
downfall of Zionism and a “liberated Palestine.” PSCABI responded
to the claims with harsh
criticism, describing the article as damaging to Palestinian solidarity efforts. Although SJP New
York City issued a partial apology, its clash with PSCABI represented a broad debate within the
anti-Israel movement. Throughout the fall, divisions formed along geographical and ideological
lines, with BDS attracting more support in the West and more opposition in the East.
Disagreement over the Syrian civil war – a subject of growing interest among anti-Israel activists –
marked another source of tension during the fall semester. Despite robust discussions on the
conflict, activists avoided conversations on a political solution to the crisis. Meetings ignored
topics related to the country’s political future, focusing almost exclusively on Syrian refugees.
in-depth panel discussions on the refugee crisis, but neither event addressed the central
question of political solutions.
Silence on the issue of a political solution suggests growing divisions among activists, who hold
widely divergent perspectives on Syria. While some students support the country’s rebel factions,
others appear hesitant to articulate their views. Controversy among SJP activists over the plight
of Syria’s Palestinian refugees highlighted these divisions. When SJP’s Cornell University chapter
released a statement
blaming rebel groups for Palestinian suffering in the Yarmouk refugee
camp, prominent SJP activists responded
with criticism, rejecting positions that “hold the armed
resistance responsible for the crimes the Assad regime.” Tensions over a political solution seem to
be festering in SJP, highlighting the potential for pronounced disagreements in the future.
Alongside divisions within the campus movement, ICC has observed conflicts between anti-Israel
students and an older generation of activists. Members of pro-Palestinian organizations have
criticized SJP’s coalition-building efforts, arguing that shared platforms are diluting support for
“Palestinian solidarity” on campus. Troubled by the growing trend of intersectionality, traditional
activists have urged students to confine their focus to Palestinian activism. These appeals have
met with strong resistance from students, many of whom value their commitments to a range of
2015 NATIONAL SJP CONFERENCE:
Laying a Foundation for Change
During the fall semester, SJP held its fifth annual national conference at San Diego State
University. Called the National Students for Justice in Palestine Conference, the event hosted
sessions for about 250 activists from October 9-11, 2015. The conference’s theme – “From
Campuses to Communities: Building a Vision for the Future” – emphasized SJP’s expansion
beyond college campuses, promoting efforts to engage community activists. In a departure
from previous years, sessions focused on strategic initiatives, seeking to bolster the effectiveness
of anti-Israel efforts.
The conference marked a turning point for SJP, setting the stage for important developments in
the anti-Israel movement. From student outreach to internal divisions, the national event
reflected broad themes in SJP’s evolution. In an important transition for SJP, students
participated in coordinated planning sessions, yielding the group’s first national agenda and
leadership structure. These developments spurred a transformation in SJP’s identity, initiating the
trends that defined its efforts during the fall semester.
Structural and strategic changes
The 2015 conference laid the foundation for broad changes on the regional and national levels.
For the first time since SJP’s founding, conference sessions included conversations on strategy,
encouraging participants to discuss issues of concern for the organization. A series of regional
breakout sessions – called the Movement Building Track – involved students in the decision-
making process, inviting activists to discuss comprehensive strategies for SJP’s regional chapters.
At the track’s concluding session, representatives gathered for a vote on the group’s national
agenda, adopting an action plan for the 2015-2016 academic year. Similar sessions focused on
best practices to promote BDS resolutions, reinforcing a tactical push toward political activism.
While defining SJP’s strategic direction, the 2015 conference established an advanced
framework for national leadership. Participants adopted major changes to SJP’s organizational
structure, voting to establish a national board with twenty regional representatives. The board’s
creation marks a significant departure from SJP’s “horizontal” structure, deviating from the
group’s traditional preference for equal status among members. It also paves the way for
coordinated national activity, establishing a cooperative framework for BDS efforts. ICC
research indicates that students will elect the board’s members during a series of regional
conferences scheduled for early 2016. Ahead of these meetings, ICC has noted increased
collaboration within SJP, with chapters launching joint initiatives across the country.
As reflected by the conference’s theme, SJP chapters have accelerated collaboration with
community activists, necessitating structural changes at the local level. With the help of social
media and other recruitment tools, local SJPs have engaged an increasing number of
community members. Community outreach has changed the structure of SJP’s New York,
Philadelphia, and Boston chapters, transforming them from campus groups into metropolitan
networks. Beginning as modest student coalitions, some chapters have expanded beyond
American campuses, blending into local communities. SJP’s conference program emphasized
this trend, advancing plans to “bolster regional communities,” while promoting activism “within
the larger scheme of a worldwide struggle for Palestinian rights.” In one workshop, students
learned “different approaches to community organizing” designed to demonstrate “that
student work can’t be divorced from the larger community.” Taken together, these events
indicate a pattern of growth on the local level, bolstered by strategic training at SJP’s national
SJP’s institutional development poses a critical challenge for pro-Israel activists. The emergence
of a national agenda marks a shift toward strategic planning, an important precondition for
effective activism. Much like its strategy-building efforts, SJP’s updated leadership model lays the
foundation for further organizational development.
While it advanced collaboration between students and communities, the 2015 conference also
reflected divisions within SJP’s national movement. The gathering marked a critical juncture in
SJP’s national debate over BDS, providing opportunities for students to voice their differences. Aworkshop titled “The Future of Divestment: Where Do We Go from Here?” addressed the growing
BDS divide, highlighting calls for alternatives to divestment initiatives. Disagreement over SJP New
York City’s article on divestment, published just days before the conference, drove a clear
wedge between attendees, creating divisions along regional lines. Overall, the conference left
an impression that the BDS movement was burdened by controversy – a sense that
strengthened as the semester continued.
SJP’s conference highlighted a trend of professional support for the group’s activities. A “legal
strategy workshop for SJP activists” featured advice from Palestine Legal, with an attorney
presenting “strategies for creative campus actions” and guidance on free-speech rights. The
session educated students on responses to discrimination, reflecting professional backing for
efforts to pressure campus administrations. Palestine Legal’s role emphasized growing assistance
from various professional groups – including Jewish Voice for Peace and the National Campus
BDS Support Team – which have provided SJP with significant strategic guidance and material
support. During the fall, much of this advice focused on “structure building,” inspiring the
leadership models and strategies adopted during SJP’s conference.
The fall 2015 semester marked a critical juncture for the campus BDS movement as evidenced by organizational and strategic changes on a national level. Anti-Israel activists maximized the benefits of existing partnerships, expanding outreach to their allies through shared ideological platforms. The spread of intersectionality has redefined campus activism, leading BDS activists to rely increasingly on the visibility of other campus causes.
Throughout the fall 2015 semester, BDS activists launched targeted campaigns against pro-Israel students, including initiatives to exclude pro-Israel representatives from student government. This coincided with the intensification of hostile demonstrations, reflecting a departure from passive techniques employed in recent years. At the same time, national anti-Israel organizations expanded their support for student groups, increasing the sophistication and reach of SJP and its allies.
Five years after its first national conference, SJP has adopted a sophisticated organizational framework. By expanding its infrastructure and embracing strategic adaptability, SJP has shown its determination to achieve greater national influence in the years ahead. Even as the anti- Israel movement evolves and expands, differences of opinion threaten to divide its members.
With an increasing number of SJP activists challenging the efficacy of BDS initiatives in student governments, intersectionality has moved to the forefront of anti-Israel campus activism, reshaping the efforts of Israel’s detractors.
A convergence of trends is transforming the anti-Israel movement on American college campuses. In this context, pro-Israel students must continue to build relationships beyond the traditional pro-Israel community. With resources and guidance from a broad coalition of national pro-Israel organizations, the pro-Israel community can overcome anti-Israel challenges and strengthen support for Israel on campuses across the country.